DAY WHATEVER: It Doesn't Matter, Because The Pauper is Dropping the Paup
As we go through life, the paths and goals we set out for ourselves ebb and flow as flippantly as the tides. A year and some odd weeks ago, I set out to write a blog about the striking life decision I made to quit a job of unrest and pursue anew. And as I venture further away from that decision, it becomes less a defining factor of my life, and just what it is. A choice.
With that, I am making a choice about this blog. It will no longer be a reflection of that change, but a space to put the proverbial pen to paper (or fingers to keys, as technology would have it.)
So instead of talking about some grand self discovery, I'm going to discuss a film.
Last night, after a not so long day at work, I came home to do some laundry at the non-peak hour of 11:00 p.m. Instead of filling my time with sit-com reruns or inconsequential ambient television like Chopped, I decided to delve into the meat. So I used the powers of the Internet to watch Jonathan Glazer's Under the Skin.
The "plot" is simple (I used quotes because the plot would make a first year screenwriter's head spin.) An alien seductress arrives in Glasgow with one mission: Harvest men. For what? It doesn't matter. Because the film isn't about the alien's mission at all. Only halfway through the film do we get a glimpse at any sort of plotted conflict. The alien wants to know what it's like to be human.
Immediately after watching the film, my mouth hung open like a bass who had given its final breath. Filled with scenes about the environment, focusing on moments where 2 + 2 = 5; it felt like an undertaking as a viewer. An arduous task not meant for an Internet grown audience with the attention span of a gerbil on mescaline.
I needed to decompress. Without a companion to discuss the film's merits, I needed to seek solace in the comment boards of strangers. And what did I find? A mixture of people praising its audacity combined with people disparaging it for its pretentiousness.
I remember the early stages of my humble cinephile beginnings. She's a girl who saw The Matrix at 12 years old but didn't understand it until she was forced to write a paper on it in college. She's a girl who claimed Memento was her favorite movie, but couldn't describe the plot to her father at his behest. She's a girl who fastforwarded through 2001: A Space Odyssey's "Starchild" sequence. She's a girl who said things were great, but secretly thought they were bull shit.
Being someone who has spent the better part of her twenties trying to reverse this frame of thought, I can understand the gripes that Under the Skin is pretentious. It spends half its running time showcasing the alien's prowess at bringing men back to her home. It fetishizes the Scottish coastal landscapes. It leaves blank spaces for our minds to fill.
But it also creates some of the most beautiful imagery and disturbing sequences I have ever seen. The harvesting of the men, the couple lost at sea, the disfigured man. These are scenes of beauty, imagination, and intent.
We dismiss things we don't understand as pretentious, because we don't want to be excluded. No one wants to miss the point. So it's easy to brush off a complicated film as "art house bull shit." It gives us a feeling of superiority when, in fact, we feel anything but.
I'm not dismissing viewer's claims of pretension as unwarranted. Perhaps it is. But by all means, give yourself the service of justifying your perspective. Don't live in a world on the defense.
However, as a former abuser of this defense mechanism, I can tell you that I've been listening to the music from this film this entire post. I've been running through images in my head as I type. I've been fighting back tears of revelatory beauty as I struggle to find the right way to express how I feel about this film. If that sounds pretentious, then maybe that's the world I want to live in. A world where art affects me. Sends a jolt down my spine. A world where I push myself to care.




